Been reading when not scramming for that deadline that's been moved-- thank You, Lord.
~I think I've spotted
a pal of Carlisle's in the real world:
THE MYSTERIOUS FIGURE we now know as
the Comte de Saint-Germain was first
witnessed in 1710 under the name the
Marquis de Montferrat. Seen in Venice by a
musician named Rameau and a Parisian
socialite called Madam de Gergy, he had the
appearance of a man between 40 and 50
years of age. It was an appearance he would
hold all his life, and he would only officially
die in 1784. However, many people believe
he never actually passed away. To them, this
enigmatic character has become known as
‘Saint-Germain the Deathless’.
Saint-Germain’s provenance was never
revealed, not even by those he had taken into
his confidence. For his entire life he looked
like a middle-aged, strongly built man of
average height. He was an amazing raconteur
with incredible stories, and had some
impressive talents. He could create fantastic
jewels, had a complete understanding of
music and art, and was able to provide
people with potions which he claimed were
the elixir of youth. He was never seen to eat
or drink, but he enjoyed the company of
women and mixed with the aristocracy. He
never seemed to age.
His great period of celebrity was in Paris
between 1750 and 1760. His main role was
that of spy for King Louis XV. However, his
friendship with the king created many
enemies within the French government and
he was forced to flee to England. He
resurfaced in Russia under the name General
Soltikov and played a major role in the 1762
revolution. At the start of Louis XVI’s reign
he reappeared in Paris and, through an old
friend, the Countesse d’Adhemar, he issued a
warning to Queen Marie Antoinette of the
dangers that were building for the French
monarchy. Saint-Germain tried to see the
king personally, but the police were ordered
to capture the Comte by the king’s minister.
Again, Saint-Germain simply disappeared.
He apparently sought refuge at the castle of
Count Charles of Hesse Cassel in the Duchy
of Schlesing, Austria. It was said that he
revealed many of his secrets to the count, but
by 1784 Saint-Germain had simply grown
bored of life and died. However, there is no
official record of his death, and no tombstone
bearing his name. He left all his papers, many
of which concerned freemasonry, to the
count, but like Louis XV, Charles never
revealed anything about Saint-Germain’s real
history. Indeed, even though he claimed to be
sad that Saint-Germain had died, many
commentators have suggested he did not
appear so upset, and there is a theory that he
may have been privy to a staged death.
Certainly, further reports of Saint-Germain
have been recorded. In 1786 he met the
Empress of Russia, and in 1788 he was
apparently the official French representative
at the World Convention of Freemasons. The
Countess of d’Adhemar said she had met her
old friend in 1789, 1815 and 1821, and that
each time he looked no older than her
memory of him. It is said that he continued
to have an influence on secret societies and
may even have been a guiding light of the
Rosicrucians.
So who was the strange character?
Parisians who disliked him said he was the
son of a Portuguese Jew named Aymar, or an
Alsatian Jew called Wolff. However, the
general feeling at the time was that he was
the natural son of Spain’s Charles II’s widow,
Marie de Neubourg. A more recent study has
suggested that he may actually have been
one of the sons of Prince Francis Racoczi II of
Transylvania. The prince gave his children to
the Emperor of Austria to bring up, but one
of them was said to have died at a young age.
It is now considered that this child may
have, in fact, been raised by a family in the
little village of San Germano in Italy. This
would account for how he assumed the name
the Comte de Saint-Germain.
However, some people, particularly those
involved with the Theosophy movement,
believe Saint-Germain may have been one of
the ‘great masters’, sent to show developed
men the errors of their ways. They believe he
may be still wandering the Earth, waiting for
the right time to reappear and counsel Man
through troubled waters. Until then,
however, the enigmatic figure known as the
Comte de Saint-Germain will remain a
mystery.
^_~
Ooh, and in case I go to Lourdes to drink from the spring, I might go to Saint-Medard, too. Emphasis on "might".
WHEN THE DEACON of Paris, François
de Paris, died in May 1727, great
swathes of mourners attended his
funeral. The congregation was sorrowful, for
François was only 37, and was said to have
holy healing powers. The emotional crowd
followed his coffin as it was placed behind
the high altar in the small church of Saint-
Médard. One by one, the congregation
slowly trundled past the body, paying their
respects and laying tokens of affection. One
crippled boy shuffled up to the coffin with
the help of his father. As they looked onto
the clergyman’s peaceful face, the boy was
suddenly hit by a powerful physical
reaction. Members of the crowd struggled to
control his squirming body as it was hit by a
series of savage convulsions. They pulled
him away from the altar and the convulsions
stopped. The boy opened his eyes, stood up,
and with a look of complete joyous
realisation, began dancing and singing
around the church, his malformed right leg
now taking the weight as easily as his left.
This event was the beginning of an
extensive range of miracles that happened
over a five-year period and originated at the
churchyard of Saint-Médard. What is most
remarkable about this series of unexplained
incidents is the complete integrity and
intelligence of those that witnessed the
events. Although many of the Deacon’s
followers were poor, unhealthy and perhaps
easily fooled, others who observed these
bizarre happenings were lawyers, scientists
and respected public figures. The most
detailed and believable witness accounts
came from a magistrate, Louis-Basile Carré
de Montgéron. Montgéron had a lawyer
friend by the name of Louis Adrien de Paige
who had long described the Saint-Médard
events, but Montgéron was convinced his
friend was being fooled. Despite not particularly
wishing to go to the churchyard,
Montgéron relented and agreed to visit.
The two men arrived at Saint-Médard on
the morning of 7th September 1731. What
Montgéron saw immediately shocked him;
women writhing on the floor; men beating
other women with wooden and metal bars;
there was even one woman whose nipples
were being twisted in a metal clamp. All the
time, the women did not seem to feel pain, in
fact they pleaded for more punishment.
Paige explained that this treatment cured the
women of their deformities and diseases.
Things quickly became more disturbing for
Montgéron when he saw a teenage girl sitting
at a table eating from a plate. As Montgéron
approached, he could see that the girl was
eating human faeces and drinking human
urine. The girl had previously suffered from
a psychological problem that caused her to
constantly wash her hands. Not only was she
cured of this neurosis, but the most amazing
part of the episode occurred as she appeared
to begin vomiting. Out of her mouth poured
pure cow’s milk.
As Montgéron stumbled around the
churchyard, he came upon a group of women
who were cleaning infected cuts and boils by
licking the poisons from them. Montgéron
watched as a young child, suffering form the
most appallingly diseased leg had her
bandages removed. Even the woman who
was to perform the cleansing needed to pray
for strength. But after a moment she began,
removing and swallowing the festering
tissue, leaving a perfectly clean leg. During
this first visit Montgéron saw enough
miracles to leave him emotionally
exhausted. He continued to revisit the
churchyard many times, collecting enough
evidence for an incredible book. That year,
he was thrown into prison for handing a
copy of the tome to a disgusted King Louis
XV. But Montgéron would not be silenced,
and published three further books demonstrating
an honest, serious examination of
the miracles in the churchyard of Saint-
Médard.
The French authorities grew concerned
that these miracles would undermine their
power and the king tried to close the
churchyard. At the time, the writer Voltaire
quipped: ‘God is forbidden by order of the
King to perform any more miracles in the
cemetery of Saint-Médard’. When soldiers
were sent to seize the church land they failed
totally. The stories of Saint-Médard spread
and persisted for years, and the Scottish
philosopher, David Hume wrote that there
was never ‘so great a number of miracles
ascribed to one person’, as those attributed to
François de Paris. It is a truly enduring
mystery.
~ From
100 Strangest Unexplained Mysteries, Matt Lamy